I haven’t
heard back from Thurrock Council or Cllr Gledhill regarding my article savaging
the statement issued by them defending the ‘service charges’ they intend to add
to council tenant’s rent but I know they are going to use the “well, we don’t
have the budget that we used to have” line.
This is
a very true statement but let’s look at the evidence that Thurrock Council
themselves posted on their website as a way of working out why they don’t have
as big a budget as they used to. Below I
have included a screen grab of the funding document which is downloadable from
the Thurrock Council website (https://www.thurrock.gov.uk/paying-your-council-tax/your-council-tax-bill-explained).
As you
can see, the General Revenue Grant has decreased and will, according to the
estimated forecasts on the table, continue to fall over the next couple of
years; in fact it has been dropping consistently from 2012/13. As stated in the document Revenue Grants are
for the annual funding of services and while some must be spent on specific
services, the rest supports the overall council budget. The decrease in the General Revenue Grant
would obviously put pressure on Tory-run Thurrock Council. But we must look at where the Revenue Grants
come from and the title of the above document gives us that information – it’s “funding from government”. Given this piece of information, and bearing
in mind that the current ‘government’ is also Tory-run, it seems that the
current Tory administration is simply learning the truth that it tried to hide
from people when it was in opposition that it’s
difficult to pay for things when the Tory ‘government’ is insisting on slashing
grants to local authorities in pursuit of their ideologically-motivated
austerity agenda.
Are the
council tenants of Thurrock cutting the level of funding from central
government? Of course not.
The
Thurrock Tories wanted to increase council rents by 9%. Who stopped them?
Tory central ‘government’ who pledged to reduce
council rents by 1% in a blatant attempt to buy the working class, council
tenant vote.
Given
this obstacle to their attempts to increase council rents, Thurrock Tories had
to find another way to raise some extra cash so they came up with the idea of
the ‘service charges’. Original
proposals would have added up to the 9% rent increase they wanted to institute
in the first place but that was voted down by Labour and UKIP so new proposals
were drawn up which brings us to the situation that Thurrock’s council tenants
find themselves in now – an increase of between 5% and 7.6% in approximate
terms.
However,
given all this, we still have the Capital Grants to look at. These are funding for one-off projects and
investments.
According
to the Capital Grants table, Highways and Environment is getting an estimated increased grant in 2017/18 of
£9.796m (up from the £5.110m grant in 2016/17).
Now it
is possible that the money has been earmarked for specific projects within that
category, but as the “14 play parks, 50 hectares of green space, 13 hectares of
footpaths, a further 30 hectares of hard surfaces and over 2,000 trees” that
Cllr Gledhill referred to come under that category, one could suggest that
Thurrock Council will have the money to cover it.
Given
that those items are also already paid for by Council Tax revenues, one might
argue that Cllr Gledhill and his administration don’t have a leg to stand on
when trying to defend the ‘service charges’ argument.
Yes,
the Capital Grant for Highways and Environment does drastically reduce in the
following two years but they know who they can squarely point the finger at for
that – their Parliamentary brethren. Their
council tenants have nothing to do with that decision (unless, of course, they
help vote in a different administration at the national level).
And,
for the Tory-voting members of Thurrock, you can’t keep blaming Labour for the
financial mess the UK is in because the Tories have been in power for 7 years
and have done little to sort out the problems in our economy. All they’ve done is blame Labour and use the
financial mess as an excuse to do what they would have done even if the UK was
in better economic shape – cut services, slash budgets and attack the poor and
disadvantaged.
My
message to Tory voters – stop blaming Labour
for your failures and lack of compassion!
To suggest that Capital Grants could be used for the maintenance of parks and green space tells me that you don't have a very good understanding of the way public sector finance works.
ReplyDeleteWell I just like to start by saying that it’s nice that you found yourself brave enough to slag me off in anonymity; it’s so cowardly to actually use one’s own name. I could block brave people like yourself from posting anonymously but I’m a champion of free speech (whilst it still exists in the UK) so I continue to allow anonymous comments.
DeleteUnder the Capital Grants section of the document I screen-grabbed from Thurrock Council’s website, you will find a section entitled Highways and Environment. Now, whilst the funds may be allocated to certain specific projects, there is no reason why, given that the Tory administration is so financially responsible (yeah, right) that they couldn’t either make some of that money available through the use of efficiency savings or finding cheaper suppliers/contractors (let’s face it, it’s not as though the Tories aren’t already doing some questionable things for their own ends, both in Thurrock and Westminster) or they could apply for a small top-up grant for a one-off spruce up project which encompasses all the items listed under Highways and Environment. I’m sure that the former suggestion would suit the Tories better as they are underhanded by nature.
Do feel free to have another go at me because I’ve got all the time in the world.