Below is the full text, apart from the removal of my
friend’s name, of a letter to Stephen Metcalfe, the Parliamentary
representative of the neighbouring constituency to mine. I don’t really expect a reply or any help as
Parliamentary etiquette demands that MPs only take on cases for their own
constituents but you never know.
Dear
Mr Metcalfe,
I am
writing to ask for your help in a delicate matter. I am not actually one of your constituents
but I am a resident of Thurrock who is having trouble with your Parliamentary
colleague, Jackie Doyle-Price.
I
was told by a friend of mine, ___________, who is a regular correspondent with
yourself that, regardless of the amount of e-mails he sends you, you always
acknowledge receipt of each one and provide a reply to each one as well. This being the case, I thought I would
approach you with my problem in the fervent hope that you may be able to have a
discrete word with Ms Doyle-Price.
I
sent a lot of e-mails to Ms Doyle-Price and not only did she not acknowledge
receipt of them in most cases but she has not replied to any of the points I
raised with her. In fact, her only reply
accused me of overt hostility and failed to answer any of the points I brought
up in any of the e-mails. I admit that
the e-mails are strongly worded and assertive but none could be considered
hostile. Ms Doyle-Price stated that
"I have no need of a pen friend" and that she was "under no
obligation to indulge" the correspondence which she believed was
"becoming unpleasantly hostile" in "tone and volume".
Ms
Doyle-Price also sent me an Easy Read leaflet on the role of an MP despite the
fact that, as you can see, I am rather an articulate writer and not someone
with a learning difficulty.
If
you are willing to intercede in this matter, I am willing to send you copies of
all the correspondence to which I refer together with scans of Ms Doyle-Price's
letters.
Regards,
Myles
Cook
As usual, any reply I get will be posted here on this
blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment